My Daddy's Common Sense

Is common sense no more?

Archive for the month “March, 2013”


Did you happen to catch the latest flurry on gun control between Senators Ted Cruz and Diane Feinstein?  Senator Feinstein made a complete ass of herself when asked a simple question.  The question was, and I paraphrase, “Does the lady (now that is a stretch since she is but one of the witches of the West) believe that the same formula she is proposing for the Second Amendment would be acceptable for the First and Fourth Amendments as well?”  She realized very quickly that the formula of her and the government deciding what guns should be banned would then lend itself to her and the government deciding what will be protected by the First Amendment and who will be protected under the Fourth Amendment of “search and seizure”.   It was just a question for goodness sake; but, she decided to be offended while debating the issue. Sen. Feinstein said that she respected Sen. Cruz opinion and he should respect hers. That’s all in fine, but what about respecting the opinions of those in this country…she thinks that we all go along with her idea, wrong!! She “got her panties in a wad” and tried to say that she was being lectured.  She may have a point; but, isn’t that what honest debate is–a back and forth?  She had to fall back on the I’m a woman and you should not talk to me in the same fashion you would a male senator.  Bull hockey!!!  Hey, Senator Feinstein,” if you can’t handle the heat and it shows that you can’t, put on you apron and clean the rest of the house but stay out of the kitchen”.  If you want equal pay and to be treated like a man, then stop your wining, witch.

If she gets her way, the “Black Community” better be afraid of what is to be presented next.  Wasn’t that how the “Old Dixiecrats” controlled the slaves?  That’s right, the slaves were banned from having firearms.  It wasn’t a good idea then and it is not a good idea today.  They will tell you it will never happen but it makes “common sense” for the next step to be to control and/or ban guns where all the shootings are located and to ban guns from those doing the shooting.  Does New York City, Chicago, D.C., Atlanta, Houston and L.A. come to mind as where the most shootings occur? And, do the minorities of Blacks and Hispanics who are doing the shootings ring a bell?  That’s right, the powers to be and Senator Feinstein, who thinks she is a part of that group, will ever so shyly come to the conclusion: “that if we just take the guns out of these people’s hands in these neighborhoods then most of the shootings will stop”.  Do not think, all you Blacks and Hispanics out there, that they will not come to this conclusion when they see the “hand writing on the wall” that their total “gun grab” will not be successful.  She and the government will fall back to the position that they are trying now which is to limit just some of the guns.  It makes “common sense” that they will come to the conclusion that if we can ban some of the guns; then, we should be able to limit or ban certain people from ever having a gun.  Now, “universal background checks” takes on a complete new meaning.  Be careful of what you allow to be stripped of your “rights” one small step at a time.

All the “Witches of the West”, that’s Feinstein, Waters and Polosi, need is Jack Nicholson and we could have a new movie, “The Witches of Westwick” instead of “The Witches of Eastwick”.  Nicholson just thought he had problems with the gals back east wait til “The Witches of the West” get done with him.  I think he is already touched a little, but that threesome will drive him over the edge.  You all know I’m just having a little fun at their expense just because they are democrats, but you have to admit it is” one hell of a comparison”.  We should be allowed to entertain ourselves at their expense since they entertain themselves at our expense.  An uneven trade as far as I’m concerned, but at least we get something for our money because they do nothing to “earn their keep”.

All kidding aside now, this is serious business, letting the government decide who it will allow to possess a firearm.  This is no “laughing matter” at all, especially the minority community who better be paying attention.  No one should ever be able to stop you from doing anything that “God” gave you the right to do, nothing and no one, “Do you hear me?”  I know that crazy people should not be allowed to possess firearms (a medical problem); but, we should never ever stand close to that” slippery slope” of banning firearms.  It just makes no “COMMON SENSE” to do so.



Anyone who has reviewed my articles, or who knows me, will readily know of my disdain for the democratic party.  I feel that they lie when the truth would sound better; and they have been on the wrong side of history concerning many issues including Civil Rights.  That’s what I said “Civil Rights”.  Al Gore’s daddy was one of the old yellow dog democrats that voted against civil rights.  The democratic party wants to keep the slavery thing going by keeping people on welfare so they can never really be free.

I’m sure you are asking yourself what does the title and Civil Rights have to do with one another.  I mentioned the Civil Rights to show as an example of how the democratic party has covered up their true feelings and deeds when it comes to what most blacks believe.  The democratic party has done the same thing to people in reference to the Social Security Act.  Most people, if questioned on the street, would say that the democrats are for the betterment of the program, but just the opposite is true.  The democrats call it an entitlement program, as if it is a gift, which it is not.   You have paid into the program your entire working life and you deserve what you get. The system is giving you nothing; you earned it.  It is true that the program of today is a Ponzi scheme where the workers are paying for the retired. But if the program had not been robbed, we would not be “robbing Peter to pay Paul” as is the case in today’s world. This would not be happening had President Johnson not moved the Social Security Fund into the General Fund.  This allowed for the politicians to access the funds and the rest is history.  History like: President Carter making it possible for Social Security funds to be available to immigrants and President Clinton taxing the Social Security benefits.  That’s right, because before Al Gore cast the deciding vote, there were no taxes on your benefits.

Now tell me if you can, “What do all these men have in common?’  Just in case you are having trouble figuring it out, they are all Democrats.  They all passed bills which hurt the seniors in this country.  Yet most of the seniors in Florida voted for another democrat, President Obama, in the last election; and he is going to hurt the very people who helped to elect him.  Just watch and see.  The following information should open your eyes.  But, who knows?  As I think, the electorate is blind to the facts or we would have a different person in the office today.  Please review the info and you decide.

(The following is taken from an email, the author unknown.)

I am sure this will be received and read mostly by the informed.  The uninformed, the clueless, the ignorant regrettably will NOT do so — they’ll reject it as SPAM!

This needs wings for awareness

fdr.jpg Franklin Delano. Roosevelt 32nd. President, Democrat Terms of Office March 4, 1933 , to April 12, 1945

Our Social Security Franklin Delano. Roosevelt (Terms of Office March 4, 1933, to April 12, 1945), aDemocrat, introduced the Social Security (FICA) Program. He Promised:
1.) That participation in the Program would be Completely voluntary, 2.) That the participants would only have to pay 1% of the first $1,400 of their annual Incomes into the Program, 3.) That the money the participants elected to put Into the Program would be deductible from Their income for tax purposes each year, 4.) That the money the participants put into the Independent ‘Trust Fund’ rather than into the General operating fund, and therefore, would Only be used to fund the Social Security Retirement Program, and no other Government program, and 5.) That the annuity payments to the retirees would never be taxed as income. Since many of us have
paid into FICAfor years and are now receiving aSocial Security checkevery month — and then finding that we are getting taxed on85% of the moneywe paid to theFederal governmentto ‘Put Away’ — you may be interested in the following:


dde.jpg Dwight David Eisenhower 34th. President, Republican, Term Of Office: January 20, 1953 to January 20, 1961

In 1958 is the first year that Congress, not President Eisenhower, voted to remove funds from Social Security and put it into the General Fund for Congress to spend. It was ademocratically controlled Congress. < B>Congress’s logic at that time was that there was so much moneyin Social Security Fund that it would never run out / be used up for the purpose it was intended / set aside for.

————-WORSE STILL————————————————

lbj.jpg Lyndon Baines Johnson 36th..President, Democrat Term Of Office: November 22, 1963 to January 20, 1969

Question: Which Political Party took Social Security from the Independent ‘Trust Fund’ and put it into the General Fund so thatCongress could spend it?
Answer: It was Lyndon B. Johnson
(Democrat, Term of Office: November 22,1963 to January 20, 1969) and thedemocratically Controlled House and Senate.

< /DIV>

——————————————————————– Question: Which Political Party eliminated the income tax Deduction for Social Security (FICA) withholding? Answer: The Democratic Party. ———————————————————————–

bill clinton.jpg William Jefferson Clinton< /SPAN> (Bill Clinton) 42nd. President Democrat Term of Office: January 20, 1993 to January 20, 2001

al gore.jpg Albert Arnold Gore, Jr. (Al Gore) 45th. V ice President

Democrat Term of Office: January 20, 1993 to January 20, 2001

Question: Which Political Party started taxing Social Security annuities? Answer: The Democratic Party, with Albert Arnold Gore, Jr. (Al Gore) [Vice President Term of Office: January 10, 1993 to January 20, 2001 ] casting the ‘tie-breaking’ deciding vote as President of the Senate, while he was Vice President of the US ….

——————THE STRAW THAT BROKE THE CAMEL’S B ACK !!————————————————-

jimmy carter.jpg James Earl Carter, Jr (Jimmy Carter) 39th President, Democrat Term of Office: January 20, 1977 to January 20, 1981

Question: Which Political Party decided to start giving Annuity payments toimmigrants?



Then, after violating the original contract (FICA), theDemocrats turn around and tell you that the Republicans want to take your Social Security away!
And the worst part about it is uninformed citizens believe it!
If enough people receive this, maybe a
seed of Awareness will be planted and maybe changes WILL evolve! .. Maybe not, some Democrats are awfully sure of what isn’t so. But it’s worth a try.

How many people can YOU send this to? Actions speak louder than bumper stickers. AND CONGRESS GIVES THEMSELVES 100%RETIREMENT FOR ONLY SERVINGONETERM!!!


thomas jefferson.jpg Thomas Jefferson 3rd. President, Democrat Term of Office: January 20, 1777 to January 20, 1781

“A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have”.

Thomas Jefferson

Now that you have had a chance to look over the information, I hope you realize that you were duped.  The democratic party is not interested in “what is good for the country or its people.” It is only interested in holding on to its power and the people “be damned”.  I’m sorry and I know the “truth hurts”. But, it is time for all the people who vote to educate themselves before doing so.   After all is said and done, it only makes “COMMON SENSE” to do so.  Just like my old daddy always told me “COMMON SENSE, SON, COMMON SENSE“.

Post Navigation